Information
> Commercialisation
Licensing
Competencies required
Different competencies may be required depending on the nature
of the licence arrangement. Relationship building and
maintenance skills are essential, as the licence is an ongoing
commitment by both parties to the licence.
The licensor may be required to provide varying levels of
ongoing support, such as technical assistance or support, or may
agree to supply materials or components required in the
manufacture.
In some licences, very little ongoing support or assistance will
be required to be given by the licensor.
Resource investment
The degree of resource investment required will depend entirely
upon the terms of the licence itself. The licensor may have
to protect and enforce its IP rights in various territories.
It may have to appoint a relationship manager to oversee the
licence. In general however, the licensor's primary role is
to provide the IP, around which the licensee builds a
business. Accordingly, a licensor may be required to invest
very little in terms of resources.
IP protection
The stronger the IP protection, the better from a licensing
perspective. However, it is possible to licence know-how and
trade secrets, which have little if any formal protection.
These licenses can be extremely lucrative.
However, the weaker the IP, the more difficult it will be to
require higher royalty rates and/or attract licensees.
Competitive landscape
If there is a significant number of competitors in the market,
then there are numerous potential licensees. The determining
factor will be the degree to which the new innovation will provide
an advantage to one of these operators over their competition,
without cannibalising its existing business.
Risk and return
In a highly competitive market, each player may be looking for
that slight advantage that the IP might provide.
The risks faced by the licensor are based primarily around the
possibility of a poorly performing licensee. These can be
mitigated using various performance clauses in the licence
agreement and careful due diligence during the negotiations.
However, depending upon the precise terms of the licence, the
licensor may also be open to product technical failure risks and
market failure risks. However, the licensor's exposure to
these risks will in most cases be far less than that of the
licensee.
The returns from licensing depend upon the performance of the
licensee(s) and the innovation itself.
Advantages
- Licensor retains possible upside of blockbuster technology
- Licensee bears most risk
- Mechanisms for control over the process can be negotiated
- Greater ability to access different geographic and field of use
markets
- Little capital investment is required
Disadvantages
- Licensee takes the bulk of returns
- Possible exposure to poor licensees