Information
> Commercialisation
Direct investment (doing it yourself)
Competencies required
A business wanting to commercialise an innovation itself, will
need access to competitive manufacturing facilities and good
distribution channels. Very few businesses will have the
necessary manufacturing and distribution capabilities required to
commercialise a new product, at least in all possible markets for
the product. Those with manufacturing facilities may not have
the capacity to supply world demand for the product, or be able to
produce it at a cost competitive with foreign manufacturers or
substitute products.
Accordingly, strong relationships with external manufacturers
and distributors will be required in each region or market for the
product.
Resource investment
Serious investment in manufacturing and distribution facilities
is required, unless these functions will be sub-contracted.
Significant funding will be required (either equity or debt) to
finance the purchase of raw materials, manufacturing and packaging
costs, and transport to distribution channels.
Coordinating the operations and logistics relating to
manufacturing and distribution will require significant human time
and effort. It may be necessary to employ a production
manager, marketing manager, distribution manager and sales/account
managers.
IP protection
Direct investment is suitable for almost any IP portfolio.
However, where the IP protection is limited, the risk of a
competitor mimicking the innovation and directly competing may make
the sizeable investment required for direct investment subject to
unacceptable risk.
Competitive landscape
If the innovation is truly new, there may be few if any
competitors. This also means there may be few if any
potential licensees. Accordingly, the direct investment route
may be the only alternative.
If the market for the innovation is littered with potential
competitors, then again, the investment required for direct
investment may be exposed to unacceptable levels of risk.
Risk and return
The risk associated with direct investment is considerable, due
to the significant money and other resource required to execute the
strategy. The degree of risk will vary depending on the
nature and profile of the business seeking to commercialise the
innovation. Direct investment for a multinational in a core
market is not necessarily a risky proposition and in fact may be
the commercialisation path that leads to greatest returns. A
New Zealand based SME looking to set up a manufacturing and
distribution subsidiary in Europe, even in its core field, will be
a far riskier proposition.
There is the risk the product will fail technically (and cause
loss to third parties) and/or fail in the market (due to poor
uptake, aggressive competition, regulatory failure, etc).
Following a direct investment strategy, the innovator retains
the lion's share of the return from the innovation. Having
said that, if the innovator executes the strategy poorly, it will
keep the largest share of a small return, whilst other strategies
may have lead to a smaller share of a much larger return - but
overall a greater return!
Advantages
- Strong control over the process, technology and strategy is
retained
- No share of profit or revenue is given away
Disadvantages
- The innovator bears all risk of failure
- High capital investment is required
- Requires access to manufacturing and distribution
competencies